Skip to content
Northeastern Journal

Opinion

We've Forgotten How to Disagree

I've noticed something in almost every classroom discussion I've sat through. A teacher asks a question that's supposed to open things up, and within a minute, it's not really a discussion anymore.…

Luke Johnson

· 2 min read · 7 views

Share
We've Forgotten How to Disagree

I've noticed something in almost every classroom discussion I've sat through. A teacher asks a question that's supposed to open things up, and within a minute, it's not really a discussion anymore. It's a bunch of people waiting for their turn to prove someone else wrong. Nobody's trying to figure out the answer together. They're trying to be the one who lands the best point. And if you change your mind halfway through, that's treated like you lost, not like the conversation actually worked.

I think that's where a lot of us learn to argue in the first place, and it teaches the wrong thing. It teaches you that admitting you might be wrong is embarrassing instead of normal.

Social media makes it worse. I don't think the apps caused this exactly, but they definitely reward it. The comment that gets attention isn't the one that's fair or thoughtful, it's the one that's harsh and confident. Nobody's checking their notifications hoping to see "actually, that's a good point, I hadn't thought about it that way." People screenshot the worst possible reading of what someone said and post it for their followers instead of just asking the person what they meant. And because it's all public, backing down feels like it costs you something. Nobody wants to lose in front of an audience, so nobody tries to.

It's not just politics or Twitter either. It happens at home too. I've had arguments with my brother over something as dumb as a movie where neither of us was actually trying to hear the other person out, we were just trying to win. Instead of asking why someone sees something differently, the instinct is to ask how they could possibly think that. Those aren't the same question. One means you're curious. The other means you've already decided they're wrong and you're just waiting to say so.

And I think that's the real cost here. It's not that people argue too much, it's that they stop having the arguments that matter. When disagreeing feels like a fight you have to win, people just stop bringing up the hard stuff. They keep their real opinions to themselves instead of risking being wrong out loud. So the conversations that are left end up shallow, because nobody wants to say something that isn't already bulletproof.

Actually being open to changing your mind, or letting someone see you're not sure, takes more nerve than just arguing back. But that's the whole point of disagreeing with someone in the first place. Not to beat them. To actually hear them.

We don't need fewer disagreements. We need to stop treating every one like something to win.

Related Reading

"No More War"

Opinion

"No More War"

I was fourteen, standing in a crowd in Tulsa at one of Bernie Sanders' "Fighting Oligar…

The Future Feels Different Now

Opinion

The Future Feels Different Now

I have noticed something over the last few years that I cannot really stop thinking about: adults do not talk about adulthood the same way they used to. When I was younger, adulthood sounded…

On Being Someone's Twin

Editorial

On Being Someone's Twin

People expect twins to be a matched set. They ask if we finish each other's sentences, if we felt it when the other got hurt, if there's some wordless current running between us that outsiders can't…

Comments

Join the conversation. Comments are public and appear right away — please keep them civil and on topic.

Your name is shown publicly.

No comments yet. Be the first to respond.

The Sunday Letter

One weekly email from the Northeastern Journal newsroom — local reporting, civic accountability, and the stories behind the headlines, delivered Sunday mornings.